Little Crow
He spent the vast majority of his life working deals, signing treaties, doing whatever he could to keep his people safe. Little Crow also tried to accommodate as much as possible to the dominant white culture to avoid confrontations. This sense of leadership faded quickly for Little Crow when his relationships fell through and he felt deceived. At this point, violence was inevitable. It was in 1862 that Little Crow found fighting to be his only option; he had to follow his tribe. According to Raymond J. DeMallie in Minnesota History, “Anderson suggests that the chief’s surprising decision to join in the rebellion was motivated by his personal sense of betrayal by the Americans, as well as by a hope that this action would allow him to regain political power.” Anderson has not only provided the reader with a remarkable historical narrative of Little Crow, he has also brought meaning to a life that deserved renowned recognition. He captures the full magnitude of Little Crows leadership role, his political dominance, and still keeps him grounded in his cultural beliefs. Paul Stuart articulates, “This biography will take its place among recent contributions