The Inequality of Women in the Enlightenment
The ability to grasp truth and acuire knowledge of right and wrong is what seperates our race from the animal world, yet Rousseau believes women are not capable of possessing this kind of rationale (1). He claims that women are not these so-called, “rational creaturs,” and are simply slaves to their passions. Wollstonecraft agrees with Rousseau that women are problematic, but also offers an explanation to this assumption that women were born with these characteristics. Instead of claiming that women possessed these traits from birth, Wollstonecraft argues that it is the parents who raise their daughters up to be submissive and domesticated (4). If both sexes were granted the same treatment from birth to maturity, then the grounds to believe women are inferior to men would not exist. Not only should boys, but also girls should be encouraged at an early age to develop their minds, practice rational thought, and reach his or her own potential. This would demonstrate that if given the same opportunities, girls can have the mindset to practice logic, and inevitably begin the path to being seen as equivalent to men. Wollstonecraft implies that, “The being who discharges the duties of its station is independent; and, speaking of women at large, their first duty is to see themselves as rational creatures” (Wollstonecraft, Enlightenment Reader, Page 623). Not only