COURSE INFORMATION Course Information
Course: EDU701 Education and Human Development
Semester: Sep 2013 Year: 2013 Phone: 03-55227401
Core Person
/Instructor: Associate Prof. Dr. Ros Aizan Yahaya Email: dr.rosyahaya@gmail.com
Office Hours By Appointment
Texts
Fagerlind, Ingemar and Saha, Lawrence, J. (1986). Education and National Development: A Comparative Perspective, New York: Pergamon Press.
Ohmahe, Kenichi (1991), Beyond National Borders, Tokyo: Bantam Books.
Olson, David, R. (Ed) Torrance, N. (Ed) (1999). Handbook of Education and Human Development: New Models of Learning, Teaching and Schooling: New York: Pearson Pub.
UNESCO (2005): Education for Human Development. Brasilia: Ayrton Semne Institute.
UNESCO (2011): …show more content…

The students will also need to integrate theory into practice as well as reflect on professional practice and ethical issue in order to display a conceptual understanding of the area under investigation. A score of 15.1 – 20.0% will show evidence of work quality reflective of 80% and above in the grading matrix.

A score of 10.1 – 15.0% will show evidence of work quality reflective of between 70-79% in the grading matrix.

A score of 8.1 – 10.0% will show evidence of work quality reflective of between 65 – 69% in the grading matrix.

A score of 0 – 8.0% will show evidence of work quality reflective of between 0 – 64% in the grading matrix.

3. Students will be conducting a library research and write a term paper on an issue in education and human development. In their writing, students will display their ability to use information and knowledge effectively in order to form new understanding and disseminate knowledge. Additionally, students need to show their ability to think critically and creatively in analyzing relevant issues. It is also an evident of their ability to communicate effectively in writing. A score of 25.1 – 30.0% will show evidence of work quality reflective of 80% and above in the grading matrix.

A score of 20.1 – 25.0% will show evidence of work quality reflective of between 70-79% in the grading matrix.

A score of 15.1 – 20.0% will show evidence of work quality