Cola Wars Continue: Coke and Pepsi in 2010

1217 words 5 pages
Show More
Cola Wars Continue: Coke and Pepsi in 2010
A case discussion note
January 17, 2012

1. Historically, why has the soft drink industry been so profitable?
Historically, the soft carbonated soft drink (CSD) industry has been valued at $74 billion in the United States. In order to understand the reasons why the industry has been hugely profitable despite the ‘Cola Wars’, an examination of the CSD industry with Porter’s five forces analysis will be conducted. As market leaders, the analysis will be centred on both Coke and Pepsi (hereafter “C&P”).
Threat of new competition: Barriers to entry in the CSD industry are extremely high and there are various factors to support this. Firstly, both C&P spend gargantuan amounts of funding of …show more content…

Intensity of competitive rivalry: Even though C&P are essentially a duopoly in the CSD industry, competition between the two have traditionally centred on marketing efforts like advertising, new products, and promotions rather than pricing. Their rivalry, historically, was also in a market with consistent growth. As such, profits were not adversely affected even though their rivalry was highly documented and publicised.
Threat of substitutes: There are a number of alternative substitutes for soft drinks and these include beer, bottled water, tap water, juices, tea, coffee, wine, powdered drinks, milk, and distilled spirits. Yet, according to Exhibit 1, Americans, historically, consistently drank more CSDs than any other beverage. As such, the threat of substitutes affecting C&P’s profitability was limited. To further nullify the effects of substitutes, they also produced and promoted their own range of substitutes to reduce potential losses. 2. Compare the economics of the concentrate business with that of the bottling business. Why is the profitability so different?
Using data from Exhibit 4, we are able to see that the operating income of a concentrate producer is 32% of its net sales while that of a bottler is only 8%. The reason the bottling business earns significantly lesser than its concentrate counterpart can be attributed to two main factors – significantly higher cost of goods sold

Related

  • Pepsi vs Coke
    1526 words | 7 pages

    Pepsi vs Coca Cola For more than a century, Coca Cola and PepsiCo have been the major competitors within the soft drink market. By employing various advertising tactics, strategies such as blind taste tests, and reward initiatives for the consumer, they have grown to become oligopolistic rivals. In the soft-drink business, “The Coca-Cola Company” and “PepsiCo, Incorporated” hold most of the market shares in virtually every region of the world. They have brands that the consumers want, whether it….

    Show More
  • Pepsi Strategic Management Case Study
    10447 words | 42 pages

    PEPSI CO. CONTENTS: 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2. BACKGROUND 2.1 Brief history 2.2 Current financial status 3. MISSION STATEMENT 4.1 Mission statement 4.2 Revised mission statement 4. VISION STATEMENT 5.3 Vision statement 5.4 Revised mission statement 5. EFE MATRIX 6.5 EFE matrix 6.6 EFE matrix summary 6. CPM MATRIX 7.7 CPM matrix 7.8 CPM matrix summary 7. IFE MATRIX 8.9 IFE matrix 8.10 IFE matrix summary….

    Show More
  • Dr. Pepper 7 Up Inc.
    4335 words | 18 pages

    Census 2000 figures, there should have been an increase in the Hispanic youth by 2005 and this group would become the largest ethnic youth population. They account for 17 percent of all youth under age 18 and 45 percent of all minority minors. By 2010, one minor in five will be Hispanic, amounting to a 22 percent increase in nine years. These statistics show that the Dr. Pepper/Seven Up, Inc., should invest in their advertisement of their Squirt brand to target this market. When it comes to advertising….

    Show More
  • Pepsico
    17219 words | 69 pages

    operate in a very competitive environment such as Coca- Cola Company, Schweppes and Dr Pepper. There is also significant competition from private label competitors. In 1994, Coca-Cola beverages held 25% of the soft drink market share. Coca-Cola and Pepsi were determined to regain their market share and were partaking in price wars. They reduced their price as much as 25%, which put coca cola in a difficult position. It is also harmful for Coca-Cola to partake in such activities because they could potentially….

    Show More
  • Bank of Queensland Research Paper Banking Industry
    21329 words | 86 pages

    in the 1990s, The Cho Regio n oice onal Bank of the Yea award i ar in Instit 2000, Best Reg gional Ban by the B nk Banking a Financ Industry in year 2 and ce y 2003 & 20 and th 004 he BER award for the B Mobil Banking Solution in Austral in 2009 and 2010 (“Bank o d Best le g lia 9 0 of AMB Quee ensland (ab bout us).” n n.d.). Page 3 of 4 49 Core operati activ e ing vities A un nique featu of BO is that the bank offers fran ure OQ nchise arr rangements which….

    Show More
  • Marketing Management 14th Edition Test Bank Kotler Test Bank
    173938 words | 696 pages

    Marketing Management, 14e (Kotler/Keller) Chapter 1 Defining Marketing for the 21st Century 1) Which of the following statements about marketing is true? A) It is of little importance when products are standardized. B) It can help create jobs in the economy by increasing demand for goods and services. C) It helps to build a loyal customer base but has no impact on a firm's intangible assets. D) It is more important for bigger organizations than smaller ones. E) It is seldom used by nonprofit….

    Show More

Popular Essays